Article share options
Share this on
Send this by
- Copy website website website link
A Hobart court has heard there clearly was nothing sinister or untoward within the actions of a convicted rapist and killer as he joined numerous online dating sites, and utilized an alias on Facebook.
- Curtis served 32 years in prison for rape, torture and murder and it is a subscribed intercourse offender
- The 64-year-old finalized as much as sites that are dating utilized an alias for Facebook while on parole
- Curtis had been sentenced to 3 months’ prison for breaching their community security purchase by perhaps perhaps perhaps not reporting their internet activity to authorities
Jamie John Curtis had been paroled in June year that is last serving 32 years for the duplicated rape and torture of a 19-year-old girl therefore the murder of her fiance in 1986.
Curtis is really a sex that is registered and it is from the Community Protection sign up for life.
Among the list of conditions imposed on individuals regarding the register would be that they need to report any phones that are mobile internet reports, account names and passwords to police.
The Magistrates Court heard within months of their launch, Curtis had joined three internet internet dating sites — an abundance of Fish, nasty Date and Zeus — and had a Facebook account making use of a fake title.
The facebook was used by him messenger service to deliver two communications to a female he previously started dating after meeting her online.
The 64-year-old pleaded responsible within the Magistrates Court in Hobart to breaching the Community Protection Order and an order that is restraining.
Curtis has been around custody since police searched their automobile and house in October this past year — seizing his cellular phone.
He had been additionally faced with fraudulence offences but those charges were dismissed, after prosecutors tendered no evidence today.
Curtis ‘not especially able aided by the internet’
Defence attorney Fabiano Cangelosi stated Curtis had “a belated 1980s knowledge of technology” and “a naive concept of what can be done with a cellular phone”.
“He came to be in 1955, jailed in 1986 and paroled year that is last” Mr Cangelosi stated.
“the consequence of which was that in 1986 when he decided to go to prison, he knew of computer systems but he did not get one … he previously extremely use that is limited of computer in jail.
“Emerging from prison he had been basically an individual placing a base in to the twenty-first century with a knowledge of technology from the 1980s. “
Mr Cangelosi said that while Curtis had finalized to express he comprehended the conditions associated with Community Protection Order and carried a duplicate from it with him on their phone, he would not obviously have a practical knowledge of exactly what the online world ended up being.
“He just isn’t specially able with all the internet, ” Mr Cangelosi stated.
He stated their customer “thought that the net had been a fixed thing” that needed an even more active procedure to interact with and ended up being “naive” about what their cell phone could do.
Mr Cangelosi stated the alias Curtis utilized on Facebook had not been intended to avoid authorities detection, but alternatively because he had been conscious that he is the target of unwelcome attention due to their previous crimes.
There is “nothing by itself untoward by what Curtis ended up being doing on the web sites that are dating, his attorney stated.
Offences ‘not that serious’: magistrate
In sentencing, Magistrate Michael Daley stated the breach ended up being accepted by him ended up being in component because Curtis was indeed in prison since 1986 and didn’t grasp the net.
“we additionally accept Mr Curtis had not been doing any such thing dubious by having an alias on Twitter … I think many would accept that, including me personally who’s additionally on Facebook, ” he stated.
“To commit these offences while on parole is severe and it is truly an aggravating element. “
Not surprisingly, he stated the offences were “not that serious”, but that any more offending would probably to see their face more imprisonment that is substantial.
Mr Daley sentenced Curtis to a jail that is three-month — backdated by half a year to consider enough time he had invested in jail because the breaches.
Curtis’ parole for their life phrase had been revoked during their amount of time in custody in which he will want to re-apply into the Parole Board become re-released from prison